The Sure Step methodology

By Emil Björk · Microsoft business apps consultant, Gothenburg

Microsoft's older implementation methodology for Dynamics — the phases, deliverables, and what survived in modern partner practice.

Reviewed May 20262 min read · 398 wordsPublished
On this page (9)

Microsoft Dynamics Sure Step was the formal implementation methodology Microsoft published for its Dynamics product family from the late 2000s into the mid-2010s. It is no longer actively published — superseded by Success by Design and FastTrack — but a lot of partner practice still references it, and many long-running customers' methodology documents are descended from Sure Step.

Why Sure Step existed

Before Sure Step, every Microsoft partner had a homegrown method. Quality varied wildly. Sure Step was Microsoft's attempt to give partners a common vocabulary, common deliverables, and a common gating model — so a customer migrating partners or moving from CRM to AX got a recognisable shape.

The phases

Sure Step organised an implementation into six phases:

  1. Diagnostic — sales-led discovery, business needs, high-level fit-gap, proposal.
  2. Analysis — detailed requirements, fit-gap workshop, future-state design.
  3. Design — solution design, integration design, data migration design, technical architecture.
  4. Development — configuration, custom development (AL/X++/JS), reports, integrations, data migration tools.
  5. DeploymentUAT, training, cutover preparation, go-live.
  6. Operationhypercare, support transition.

Project types

Sure Step recognised that not every engagement needed all six phases at full weight. It offered project type templates — Standard, Enterprise, Rapid, Agile, Upgrade — that tuned the depth of each phase to the scope and complexity.

Deliverables

Each phase had a catalogue of mandatory and optional deliverables — fit-gap document, solution design document, training plan, cutover plan, etc. Many partners still use templates descended from these.

Roles

Sure Step named roles — Engagement Manager, Solution Architect, Application Consultant, Technical Consultant, Trainer — that became the partner-staffing vocabulary.

What worked

The phased model, role definitions, and deliverable templates raised the quality floor of Microsoft partner work. It professionalised an industry that had been ad-hoc.

What didn't

Sure Step was waterfall by design. It assumed requirements could be specified up front and translated through a chain of deliverables. As cloud delivery and continuous updates arrived, the rigidity hurt. By 2018 it was visibly out of step with how cloud ERP/CRM implementations actually run.

The successor

Success by Design replaced Sure Step in 2019 as Microsoft's published methodology — iterative, fit-to-standard, with continuous checkpoints rather than gated phases. FastTrack programs add Microsoft-led oversight for qualifying engagements.

Practical advice for customers

If your partner's proposal language sounds like Sure Step — six phases, "blueprint document", "configuration document" — ask how they incorporate Success by Design's fit-to-standard and Power Platform-first thinking. The names matter less than the actual delivery shape.

Related guides

Browse every guide in Implementation or just Methodology.

Was this helpful?

Signals which guides land and which need work. No account, no comment box — corrections go through the contact page.

Spot something wrong or want a topic covered? Send a correction or a topic request — both are welcome.